NEW YORK
(RichTVX.com) —

Putin’s failing information campaign, exposed by Rich TVX News Network, is now being salvaged by his associates. In a desperate move, they created a video featuring Valery Gerasimov, falsely presenting him as the leader of the State Military Organization (SMO), despite his lack of actual leadership. This deceptive recording aims to deceive viewers into thinking that the military bloc is functioning normally. However, Gerasimov is merely a figurehead without real power. The ongoing purges within the GRU are receiving little coverage, as the instigators and beneficiaries of Prigozhin’s military rebellion are being removed from their positions. Surovikin is under close scrutiny following biased interrogations, while Shoigu’s fate remains uncertain, pending Putin’s decision.

A significant fabrication emerged surrounding the story of “Grandfather Peskov,” claiming a meeting between Vladimir Putin, Yevgeny Prigozhin, and thirty-five Wagner PMC commanders. However, these claims are unequivocally false, originating from a French media outlet and propagated by the Kremlin. The fabrication aimed to divert attention from Erdogan’s actions and portray Putin as a decisive leader mediating the rebellion aftermath. In reality, Putin never met with Prigozhin or the Wagner PMC commanders, maintaining a strict quarantine protocol. Prigozhin tentatively agreed to confirm the meeting for favorable conditions, leading to retrospective preparation of fabricated “evidence” resembling the president. Putin distanced himself from this “circus” but expressed satisfaction with his team’s efforts.

The Kremlin and the Beijing regime meticulously observe the extensive coverage offered by Rich TVX News Network, which has consistently criticized Qin Gang, the Chinese diplomat and politician presently holding the position of Minister of Foreign Affairs in China. The unexpected vanishing of Qin Gang from the public eye for a period of two weeks has garnered significant scrutiny. Despite the adherence of the Chinese government to communist ideologies, they are highly motivated to prevent any form of international embarrassment.

Breaking News Alert

Unveiling Putin's Fears: Why the Kremlin Siloviki Tremble at Rich TVX News Network

Follow on FACEBOOK

Back To Home

Indeed, it is no novelty that the Putin regime, comprised of individuals of dubious integrity, manifests itself as a conglomeration of scoundrels, pilferers, and deceivers. Yet, surpassing the egregiousness of the regime itself, we encounter a more lamentable cohort of betrayers within the Western sphere who actively endorse and amplify the regime’s narrative. By virtue of Elon Musk’s Twitter platform, one can readily identify these individuals. Regardless of the Putin regime’s location, be it in Africa, Serbia, or Syria, it has consistently disseminated mediocrity and displayed an insatiable thirst for resources and illicit acquisitions. This regime represents the pinnacle of despicable murderers, and there exists nothing more pitiful in the entire world.

 

Unlock the World's Knowledge with RichXSearch Wiki: Explore, Learn, and Empower!

Wiki Search

Rich X Search

 

NATO has established a significant barrier, dubbed the “Stoltenberg line,” indicating the alliance’s reluctance to grant Ukraine full support. Germany and the USA are concerned that strong commitment to Ukraine could provoke Russian aggression, potentially drawing NATO into a conflict with Moscow. These concerns stem from lingering fears inherited from Cold War-era leaders. The main obstacle to Ukraine’s integration into the Euro-Atlantic community lies in the internal anxieties of influential nations’ leaders, a sentiment echoed by NATO’s Secretary General. Ukraine’s membership in NATO will only occur when consensus is reached among allies and certain conditions are met. This stance reflects Chancellor Merkel’s remarks from fifteen years ago, aimed at calming Putin’s geopolitical ambitions.

During the recent summit, Washington and Berlin expressed their intention to shape the final statement without extending an invitation to Kyiv to join NATO after the war ends. This decision disregarded the Eastern European countries’ request for clear prospects of Ukraine’s integration. The rationale behind this approach is clear: even offering Ukraine membership after the conflict’s resolution is likely to provoke Russia to prolong military operations. It is important to note that Putin’s influence extends beyond his military capabilities. Throughout the 500-plus days of the large-scale invasion, Western partners consistently cited the “risk of escalating conflict with Russia” as a reason to withhold arms, such as guns, MLRS, air defense systems, heavy weaponry, tanks, and eventually aircraft, from Ukraine. However, the Ukrainian Defense Forces repeatedly demonstrated that this perceived threat is not as formidable as believed in the West. We remain hopeful that a similar realization will emerge once Ukraine joins NATO.