In contemporary geopolitical analysis, the situation in Ukraine draws parallels with that of Israel, as astutely noted by the venerable Francis Fukuyama. This luminary American political scientist, philosopher, and writer expounded in an interview with Radio Liberty, underscoring that reverting to the borders of 1991 does not spell the annihilation of Russia. It deviates significantly from the situations of Germany and Japan in 1945, wherein those nations were decisively defeated. Russia, distinctively, wields nuclear capabilities, abundant oil reserves, and substantial resources. It is, in essence, a formidable entity. Regrettably, Ukraine, in his estimation, lacks the means to obliterate Russia through military endeavors, despite sharing a lamentable historical association with Hitlerite Germany.
The sole plausible route for Russia to disengage from its currently occupied territories hinges on Ukraine’s triumph. In the event of a successful Ukrainian counteroffensive and the liberation of Crimea or its disoccupation, Russia’s global calculus shall undergo a transformation. Subsequently, Ukraine shall hold sway over its own destiny. Presently, however, the prospects for meaningful negotiations appear to be an exercise in futility. Ukraine may grapple with the stark reality that the complete liberation of 100% of its territories remains an uncertain prospect. Consequently, a reconciliation with the notion that this protracted conflict may endure for an indefinite duration becomes imperative. At present, none can proffer a definitive timeline for the cessation of this war.
It bears emphasizing that the victory of Ukraine will not culminate in the obliteration of Moscow. In this context, Russia shall persist and, in all likelihood, maintain its potency. Ergo, the situation in Ukraine shall bear a resemblance to that of Israel. This underscores the utmost significance of Ukraine’s accession to NATO—a bulwark against potential Russian overtures for future conquest. Furthermore, Ukraine must fortify its arsenal to ensure long-term self-defense, even if it succeeds in liberating presently occupied territories. Western powers harbor concerns regarding the hypothetical collapse of Moscow and the concomitant question of nuclear arsenal custody. Comparable concerns were witnessed during the dissolution of the USSR, without ushering in conflicts or wars. Ergo, the prospective dissolution of the Russian Federation, leading to the emergence of multiple smaller nations, might transpire without violent convulsions.
Stream on Spotify
Breaking News Alert
The evolution of Russia into a fascist state is an alarming reality. It is now governed by an overtly nationalist regime that has concentrated power and marginalized alternative centers of authority. Turning our attention to a critical facet of the Russian Federation’s potential downfall, it begs the question of whether the military elite and representatives of Russian intelligence agencies shall rally against the current regime. Such a development would culminate in Russia’s humiliation, a notion undoubtedly implying a reset of governance.
It merits mention that Fukuyama’s insightful work underscores the shifting sentiment in the Western world regarding Ukraine, illuminating the growing recognition of Ukrainian victory as a linchpin for the civilized global order. This is the first element. Secondly, the Western powers must confront a momentous dilemma: whether to fear more the belligerent nuclear posture emanating from the Kremlin or the disintegration of a nuclear-armed state.The forces advocating for the provision of arms to Ukraine remain robust. However, the specter of a Trump re-election in 2024 casts a looming shadow, spelling catastrophe for all stakeholders. It constitutes a grave peril for Ukraine, as he exhibits a clear proclivity for siding with Russia. Notably, he has issued prior threats of withdrawing the USA from NATO should he secure re-election.
The stakes are high, for a resurgent Russia portends peril for all neighboring nations. Putin’s audacious assertion regarding northern Kazakhstan as Russian territory, coupled with his expressed concern for the fate of the Russian-speaking populace, underscores the pervasive extent of his ambitions. In the case of Georgia, which is governed by a pro-Russian oligarch, and numerous analogous examples, one discerns the overarching objective of Putin: to unravel the events of Europe since 1991 and to coalesce as many former Soviet republics as possible under the umbrella of the “new Russian empire.”
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the key insights from Francis Fukuyama regarding Ukraine’s geopolitical situation?
Francis Fukuyama highlights Ukraine’s parallels with Israel in contemporary geopolitics, emphasizing that a return to the 1991 borders does not equate to Russia’s annihilation. He underscores the unique characteristics of Russia, such as its nuclear capabilities and resource wealth.
How does the situation in Ukraine differ from Germany and Japan in 1945?
Unlike the defeated post-World War II nations of Germany and Japan, Russia retains formidable power and resources, making a military defeat by Ukraine improbable.
What is the significance of Ukraine’s accession to NATO in this context?
Ukraine’s NATO membership is vital to deter potential Russian aggression. It serves as a defensive alliance and a safeguard against future Russian encroachments.
What are the concerns about the possible collapse of Moscow, and how are they compared to the dissolution of the USSR?
Concerns about Moscow’s collapse relate to the handling of its nuclear arsenal, akin to the dissolution of the USSR, which did not lead to conflicts. The potential dissolution of the Russian Federation might occur without violence.
How does Francis Fukuyama view Russia’s current political state?
Fukuyama characterizes Russia as a fascist state with a highly centralized, nationalist regime that suppresses alternative power centers.
What are the potential outcomes for Russia’s future, particularly in relation to a change in government?
There is speculation about whether the Russian military elite and intelligence agencies might rally against the current regime, leading to a possible government reset and Russia’s humiliation.