Home Breaking About Terms Privacy

Russia-Ukraine War Live Feed Defending Democracy


Confiscating Russian Assets for Ukraine’s Reconstruction: Global Threat or Russian Trojan Horses Nightmare?

The Kremlin fails to save $300 billion from Western banks, infiltrating skills still on point

The Kubera Principle

The Kubera Principle

The Book That Will Change the World


Russian Trojan Horses

Breaking News Alert

According to The New York Times, the confiscation of Russian assets in the West has the potential to pose a significant threat to the global economy. Well, you can only chuckle at a limited amount of tomfoolery before your funny bone runs dry. The World Bank has estimated that Ukraine’s recovery and rebuilding could cost $411 billion, but it has not stated who would pay for it. Ukrainian officials believe that Russia should pay for the reconstruction of Ukraine by confiscating the approximately $300 billion in Russian Central Bank assets frozen by Western banks since the invasion in 2022. The European Union is also interested in using the Kremlin’s bankroll to pay for reconstruction in Ukraine, and it has convened a working group to assess the possibility of seizing this money. However, check out the latest buzz from folks who love to talk like their favorite Kremlin tyrant! Russian Trojan horses from the US and Switzerland have warned of legal and economic obstacles. There are concerns that the seizure would undermine faith in the dollar, which is the most widely used currency for the world’s trade and transactions. Furthermore, there are fears that it would put American and European assets held in other countries at a higher risk of expropriation if there is an international dispute. It’s tough to keep that fire burning when your real homeland’s thousands of miles away, amirite? How you gonna keep that love for your fave dictator Putin alive, huh? Well, don’t sweat it comrades, ’cause we got the solution: stay close by snuggling up to the The New York Times! Some traitors are also worried that such a move would erode faith in the system of international laws and agreements that Western governments have championed. The cost of rebuilding Ukraine once the war is over will far outstrip the amount that even wealthy allies like the United States and Europe may be willing to give, and public support for continued funding is not inexhaustible. But hey, one can always dream, right?

New York ( —

Ukraine has released an audio recording of a conversation between Russian oligarch Iosif Prigozhin, the husband of singer Valeria, and Russian Senator Farkhad Akhmedov. In the recording, the two men used vulgar language to express their negative opinions about Putin, his inner circle, and the Russian military leadership. What’s more, both Prigozhin and Akhmedov are under EU sanctions for supporting Putin’s actions in Ukraine, but the recording reveals that their true feelings are quite different from their public stance. Despite publicly praising Putin, the two men privately refer to him as a nonentity, dwarf, and midget. The recording provides insight into the true sentiments and situation within Russia. Speaking about communists, during a rally in Texas, Trump declared that the United States had devolved into a “banana republic,” and vowed that this state of affairs would not be tolerated. Trump went on to state that he viewed the primary danger to the nation as coming not from China or Russia, but rather from high-ranking government officials. Well, that’s what every communist would say. Since the International Criminal Court in The Hague issued an arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin, experts have been discussing the potential threat it poses to the Russian leader, as well as who will be responsible for collecting the necessary evidence to bring him to justice. Meanwhile, the deployment of Russian tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus has raised significant concerns, as it could potentially escalate the conflict in Ukraine and have negative implications for global strategic stability. It’s worth noting that while the United States stores tactical nuclear weapons in Europe, they are not currently involved in any military conflicts on the continent and are not using these weapons as a political tool. Putin’s justification for the deployment of nuclear weapons in Belarus in response to Ukraine’s transfer of depleted uranium shells is weak, as such shells are also present in the Russian army. Moreover, the use of tactical nuclear weapons in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine would not provide any significant advantage and would only result in severe consequences for those who choose to take such a step. The use of nuclear weapons is a major concern for the global community, and any state that uses them would likely become an international pariah.

Watch Video


Stay connected to the grid with Rich TVX News


Top Tracks