Testimony from a former insider detailed what can only be described as Zuckerberg’s masterclass in digital empire-building: suck the life out of real news, toss journalists a few likes for their trouble, and then cash in by keeping users frothing with rage and glued to their screens.

According to the whistleblower, Zuck’s big innovation wasn’t building community — it was wedging himself between the public and the press, driving ad revenue off a cliff, and monetizing content he didn’t pay for. All while playing the part of a humble tech founder “just trying to connect people.”

Lawmakers vs. Zuck: ‘It’s the Business Model’

Senator Amy Klobuchar even quoted one of Zuckerberg’s greatest hits: “You’re compromising with the dying industry rather than dominating it, crushing it.” Inspirational stuff from a guy who apparently thinks a free press is just a speed bump on the road to market domination.

Lawmakers didn’t hold back, accusing Zuckerberg of turning Facebook into an outrage engine — where lies go viral, extremism gets boosted, and the more divided the public, the fatter the profit margin.

“This isn’t a glitch — it’s the business model,” one senator said. “And guess who’s behind the wheel?”

🇨🇳 The China Connection: A Double Game?

But wait, there’s more. Turns out the man warning Congress that regulation would “let China win” was, behind closed doors, happily briefing the Chinese Communist Party on how to win — as early as 2015.

That’s right: while waving the American flag in public, Zuckerberg was allegedly handing China a playbook for beating U.S. tech firms at their own game.

So much for patriotic tech leadership.

Meta Under Scrutiny

Breaking News

Content Moderation: Willingness vs. Reality

And as for Meta’s reluctance to crack down on revenge porn, fentanyl sales, and other soul-crushing content? Oh, they can remove it — they just don’t. Unless it’s in China, of course. Then they’re lightning fast.

“Zuckerberg has the talent, the tools, and the teams,” the witness said. “What he doesn’t have is the will — unless there’s something in it for him.”

The Sound of Silence

Senators closed the hearing with calls for accountability and the usual chorus of bipartisan outrage, while Zuckerberg — in classic fashion — said absolutely nothing.

🚨 Final Verdict

Let’s summarize the allegations:

❌ Exploiting journalism for profit.

❌ Monetizing outrage and division.

❌ Playing a double game with China.

✅ Prioritizing profit over user safety & democratic values.

This isn’t just alleged negligence; it’s described as a deliberate strategy. And the silence from the top speaks volumes.

Because really, why respond when you’re still winning?